Last year, the US Federal Reserve launched FedNow as a competitive alternative for instant payments in the US. Celebrating its first birthday, we review how the instant payments service has been adopted over the past year.
In 2022, Nick Stanescu, business executive at FedNow Service said: “The Federal Reserve’s FedNow Service will allow financial institutions of all sizes to offer safe and instant payment services for their customers when it launches in 2023.” And this is exactly what it did. In July 2023, FedNow was launched to the public and after a year of being out in the wild, over 600 financial institutions have adopted the instant payment method.
The UK, Brazil, Australia and India are all examples of countries with extremely developed and adopted instant payment systems and FedNow aims to be the US equivalent. However there is one difference: FedNow is primarily targeted at banks – not at consumers.
Therese Hudak, VP account management, at PPRO
Commenting on how FedNow’s rollout compares to other offerings around the world, Therese Hudak, VP account management, at PPRO said: “There will be a competition for the best consumer experience and proposition, but as it looks right now, it will be more of an evolution than a revolution like what we saw in India with UPI and PIX.”
While each of the aforementioned countries has advanced their digital payment infrastructures, the US has lagged behind. In fact, in 2023, real-time payments only made up one per cent of all payments in the country.
What is actually popular?
Up to this point, US financial institutions have relied on The Clearing House‘s (TCH) Real-Time Payments Network (RTP), run by big banks. Even since the introduction of FedNow, it seems its popularity has only grown – as it hit new quarterly high values and volumes.
Ron Shevlin, chief research officer at Cornerstone
Commenting on FedNow’s ‘birthday celebration’ Ron Shevlin, chief research officer at Cornerstone Advisors, the banking consultancy, said on LinkedIn: “Seems like everywhere I turn, someone is boasting about the number of FIs that have adopted FedNow. In this case, bragging about ‘adoption’ is like a fintech bragging about how about many people have downloaded their app (ignoring—or glossing over—the actual # of people who use the app).”
So has FedNow actually been a success or are the adoption numbers a misrepresentation of its use? Are instant payment methods becoming more mainstream in the US? We set out to find out.
Accelerating instant payment methods
Tom Hewson, CEO at RedCompass Labs
Reflecting on the past year FedNow and TCH have had, Tom Hewson, CEO of RedCompass Labs, the financial service consultation firm, noted the importance of banks adopting instant payment rails.
“Banks have a difficult choice between TCH’s RTP network and the new kid on the block, FedNow. Both offer similar services, but FedNow participants can transfer funds from their Federal Reserve master account, which means they have an extra pool of resources for liquidity management. RTP, on the other hand, is interoperable which allows third-party apps like Zelle to access and build products on.
“RTP has also participated in cross-border initiatives like Immediate Cross-Border Payments (IXB) and built value-added services for its members – like the ability to attach PDF or XML documents to payment requests, and account number tokenisation. It’s a tough choice. Many banks are sitting on the sidelines as a result, waiting to see how things play out.
“The more banks signed up to RTP and FedNow, the easier it is to access instant payments, and so the more people use it. However, adoption has been slow, in part because many institutions are waiting for instant payments to achieve scale before embarking on their instant payments journey. The irony is, it will take longer for the US to achieve the scale it needs if banks do not sign up.”
An initial success
Mihail Duta, director solution consulting, payments – Americas, Finastra
Some of the banks that integrated FedNow have only completed part of the process, as Mihail Duta, director solution consulting, payments – Americas, Finastra, the financial software provider notes: “FedNow year one can be considered a success as the number of participants has grown to more than 900. However, many banks that enabled FedNow for receive only will enable send as a second phase.
“The reason for this is that much of the technology supply chain needed for initiation is not ready for the reality of a 24x7x365 operation from core to customer-facing applications, along with the speed required for inline fraud and OFAC screening for outbound payment initiation.
“Despite these challenges, US financial institutions will likely ultimately push to adopt FedNow in order to stay relevant, competitive, and to meet and exceed customer expectations at their own pace, versus one being required by regulation.”
Overcoming hurdles ahead
Peter Wood, CTO at Spectrum Search
Reflecting on the past year, Peter Wood, chief technical officer at Spectrum Search, the web3, crypto, blockchain recruitment firm, noted the potential obstacles that have emerged and could face firms looking to integrate FedNow.
“Financial institutions face several obstacles including the complex task of integration, escalating costs, and worries about cybersecurity. The need for revamping outdated systems can be both expensive and lengthy. Moreover, constructing robust cybersecurity defences against possible fraud and breaches is crucial, given that FedNow transactions occur in real-time.
“To tackle these hurdles, financial institutions must invest strategically in updating their infrastructure. Allying with fintech companies could speed up the integration process and keep costs down. Prioritising cybersecurity by employing state-of-the-art technologies and maintaining continuous surveillance can help mitigate risks. Clear guidelines and backing from the Federal Reserve can also assist in simplifying the adoption process.”
Wood even highlighted the impact the upcoming presidential election may have on its development. “The outcome of the presidential election could sway regulatory and policy decisions impacting FedNow. Different administrations might place varying levels of priority on financial innovation and regulation, which could affect the speed of deployment and uptake. Nonetheless, the core benefits of FedNow should ensure its consistent advancement, regardless of any political changes.”
Education and time
Eric Wheeler, senior director of product management at Syntellis, now part of Strata Decision Technology
Looking ahead, Eric Wheeler, senior director of product management at Syntellis, now part of Strata Decision Technology, the enterprise performance management software provider, noted the importance of consumer education and training in order to see mass adoption.
“Since its debut last summer, FedNow has gained momentum. Initially embraced by large national banks, its importance has extended to community and regional banks, as well as credit unions, enabling them to receive payments.
“However, while FedNow has picked up traction over the last year, it’s still the early days for adoption. We have not seen a radical shift in payment volume that cannibalises from other sources, as only 33 per cent of US finance leaders at banks, credit unions, and other financial institutions plan to implement FedNow this year. While FedNow shows promise in revolutionising the payment landscape, it will still require time for consumer education and training before we see widespread adoption.”
Focus on regulation and security
Jennifer Lucas, Americas payments and consulting leader, EY
Revolutionary change, as alluded to by Hudak, will be very difficult to see explains Jennifer Lucas, Americas payments and consulting leader, EY, the accounting firm. She explains that without a drastic change in regulation, cybersecurity remains a top concern.
“There has been progress over the last year, but without a regulatory mandate (that would require banks to adopt instant payments), a ‘hockey stick-like’ adoption, meaning the platform is quickly and widely adopted, is not likely. The Fed’s involvement holds a lot of weight and starts more foundational conversations around real-time payments – particularly with small financial institutions. With the Fed establishing their own instant payments platform (FedNow), instant settlement is no longer a novel innovation, but a permanent capability in the US economy.
“Fraud and security concerns are top of mind for both financial institutions and consumers, which weighs on the adoption curve for financial institutions. Given the real time and the ‘irrevocable’ nature of immediate payments, additional investments must be made in a bank’s ability to respond to the immediacy of the schemes and to continue to safeguard their clients from fraud and scams.”
The post Happy First Birthday FedNow: But is This a Cause For Celebration? appeared first on The Fintech Times.
